Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Administrator
2681 posts
|
> it would greatly benefit markup language since all the major editors have LSP clients I definitely recognize the need and benefit of having an LSP impl, but we also must be honest. Not all major editors use it. This is really about satisfying a need of VSCode and I suppose Sublime too. The IntelliJ plugin does not use LSP and is quite successful without it. But I'll let Alexander comment on whether an LSP impl would be more ideal. -Dan On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 6:21 AM gour [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote: Hello, ... [show rest of quote] -- Dan Allen (he, him, his) | @mojavelinux | https://twitter.com/mojavelinux |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
41 posts
|
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:19:38 -0700 (MST)
"mojavelinux [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion]" <[hidden email]> wrote: > I definitely recognize the need and benefit of having an LSP impl, > but we also must be honest. Not all major editors use it. Hmm, Vim has several LSP clients, Neovim is getting a native built-it one, Emacs also has, two major clients...Atom has LSP support and, as you mentioned, Sublime as well. Even Kakoune editor has it, so, imho, to make AsciiDoc more widely used, having LSP is a must. Sincerely, Gour -- attachment0 (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Administrator
2681 posts
|
I'm glad to hear there's strong support for this idea. Obviously, anything we can do to broaden adoption of AsciiDoc is great in my book. That's why I do what I do. I'm looking forward to your participation in this effort. Best Regards, -Dan On Sat, Dec 19, 2020, 02:47 gour [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:19:38 -0700 (MST) ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
48 posts
|
In reply to this post by mojavelinux
Hi, I'm the current maintainer of the IntelliJ AsciiDoc plugin. The IntelliJ plugin for AsciiDoc doesn't use LSP, it uses the native JetBrains functionality to provide editor and preview support. It builds upon lexing/parsing/indexing infrastructure of the JetBrains platform. A future LSP implementation could benefit from the work done here in some ways:
Regards, Alexander
Alexander Schwartz (alexander.schwartz@gmx.net)
https://www.ahus1.de |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |