Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
2681 posts
|
As I write and speak about Asciidoctor, I often wrestle with the name "Asciidoctor Java Integration" because it's verbose and doesn't always fit in the context of a sentence. In other words, it would be nice if it had a single-word name. I'd like to propose the short name AsciidoctorJ for the Java integration project. I like it because it follows along with the naming convention of the JavaScript integration (Asciidoctor.js) and the JavaDoc integration (Asciidoclet), and it rolls off the tongue just as easily. I also like it because it's a cool name. Why? When I was growing up, one of the best basketball players on the court was Julius Erving, known best as "Dr. J". He popularized the slam dunk. How cool is that? We want to school folks about how to slam dunk documentation in Java, so we give them AsciidoctorJ :) For now, I'd only suggest change the repository name (asciidoctorj)*, not necessarily the artifacts or packages. The focus is on giving the project a name we can use when writing and speaking about it...its popular name. Technically, it's still the Java integration, so both names fit. wdyt? |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
354 posts
|
Sounds fine to me. I'd suggest going through with the big rename for 1.5.0 Sent from my iPhone
... [show rest of quote]
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
298 posts
|
I remember discussing exactly this when we start the Asciidoctor-Java-Integration project and we arrived to the conclusion that because the solution it was not a pure Java solution, we could name Asciidoctor-Java-Integration because it was an integration. Said that, I prefer AsciidoctorJ because as Dan suggested it is easy to pronounce and shorter write. So for 1.5.0, let's change the name!!!
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
2681 posts
|
Excellent! A slam dunk!
-Dan |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 posts
|
In reply to this post by mojavelinux
+1 for AsciidoctorJ
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |