Re: AsciiDoctor & LSP support
Posted by mojavelinux on
URL: https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Re-AsciiDoctor-LSP-support-tp8404p8406.html
URL: https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Re-AsciiDoctor-LSP-support-tp8404p8406.html
I'm glad to hear there's strong support for this idea. Obviously, anything we can do to broaden adoption of AsciiDoc is great in my book. That's why I do what I do. I'm looking forward to your participation in this effort.
Best Regards,
-Dan
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020, 02:47 gour [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:19:38 -0700 (MST)
"mojavelinux [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion]"
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> I definitely recognize the need and benefit of having an LSP impl,
> but we also must be honest. Not all major editors use it.
Hmm, Vim has several LSP clients, Neovim is getting a native built-it one,
Emacs also has, two major clients...Atom has LSP support and, as you mentioned,
Sublime as well. Even Kakoune editor has it, so, imho, to make AsciiDoc more
widely used, having LSP is a must.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Re-AsciiDoctor-LSP-support-tp8404p8405.htmlTo start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML
attachment0 (849 bytes) | Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |