Asciidoctor :: Discussion

Re: AsciiDoctor & LSP support

Posted by mojavelinux on
URL: https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Re-AsciiDoctor-LSP-support-tp8404.html

> it would greatly benefit markup language since all the major editors have LSP clients

I definitely recognize the need and benefit of having an LSP impl, but we also must be honest. Not all major editors use it. This is really about satisfying a need of VSCode and I suppose Sublime too. The IntelliJ plugin does not use LSP and is quite successful without it. But I'll let Alexander comment on whether an LSP impl would be more ideal.

-Dan

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 6:21 AM gour [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello,

since there is better support for editor(s) I want to use (e.g. SublimeText) for AsciiDoc(tor) than for the ConTeXt markup, I've decided to use it for all my writings (blog posts, slide-presentations, study-notes, articles etc.), but I wonder if there is some plan to have Language Server Protocol (LSP) support for AsciiDoc since it would greatly benefit markup language since all the major editors have LSP clients?

Sincerely,
Gour

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/AsciiDoctor-LSP-support-tp8397.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

Dan Allen (he, him, his) | @mojavelinux | https://twitter.com/mojavelinux