Posted by rwinch on URL: https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Heading-7-not-handled-tp710p715.html
Thanks for the response. The more I think about it the more I think I am probably using the heading incorrectly.
The first part of my problem is that I am only using a single level 0 header due to an issue with the pdf rendering [1]. I'm not very knowledgeable on how to fix the issue myself (and a bit pressed for time), so I worked around it by increasing the headers under a parent element.
An example where I was using something like this was for attributes within our XML configuration appendix [2]. I changed this to be a bullet list in the new reference [3], but wasn't keen on needing to add the ids manually. In light of your response, I think that using a heading here was probably the wrong approach in the first place.
Another example of this happening was in the Spring Reference [4]. Again, this is translated to a header 7 due to the pdf issue.
I think your response helps with this issue. Particularly it would be good to find something in the documentation on how to deal with heading level 7.