Asciidoctor :: Discussion - Re: Is it worth refactoring asciidoctor-jruby integration into a shared library?

Re: Is it worth refactoring asciidoctor-jruby integration into a shared library?

Posted by LightGuardjp on Mar 14, 2013; 6:47pm
URL: https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Is-it-worth-refactoring-asciidoctor-jruby-integration-into-a-shared-library-tp25p39.html

I don't want to do jasciidoctor, that would imply a java port of asciidoctor. Not exactly what we're doing. I like the integration part because it says what it is that we're doing. org.asciidoctor:java-integration ?

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:43 PM, asotobu [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

mmm maybe yo are right that better another name, but I don't like putting the -integration word, how about jasciidoctor? maybe too much typical? and asciidoctor-java or asciidoctorj? OMG what a headache :P well I think that project should be called asciidoctor-java-integration for sure, but I am not pretty sure about the artifact name. Well anyway I start working and at the end we could define what to do.

Alex.

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Is-it-worth-refactoring-asciidoctor-jruby-integration-into-a-shared-library-tp25p38.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp