Login  Register

Re: Is it worth refactoring asciidoctor-jruby integration into a shared library?

Posted by mojavelinux on Mar 07, 2013; 8:03pm
URL: https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Is-it-worth-refactoring-asciidoctor-jruby-integration-into-a-shared-library-tp25p29.html

I agree, if we can find a common joint point, I'm all for it. Keeping the plugins as thin as possible, including shared bundling of Asciidoctor (and potentially Tilt) would be good for general purpose adoption.

-Dan

--
Sent from my CyanogenMod-powered
Android device, an open platform for
carriers, developers and consumers.

On Mar 7, 2013 11:54 AM, "davide.cavestro [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
[...]I'm actually wondering now if it would be
better to simply instantiate the asciidoctor object in java and not worry
about the little ruby script. Thoughts on that approach?
Granted that I'm not a specialist, I'll go for the way that provides best integration with actual and future asciidoctor environment and features.
I mean if asciidoctor loads resources from ruby environment, I'd look for a way that gives to the jvm similar access to whatever resources it needs, namely backends, configuration and so on (possibly enabling the distribution of mandatory and optional artifacts along with the library or accessible companions).


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Is-it-worth-refactoring-asciidoctor-jruby-integration-into-a-shared-library-tp25p27.html
To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML