I vote yes for cutting a 0.1.1 release.

Jason and Ryan?

-Dan

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Dan Allen <[hidden email]> wrote:

We are just about ready for the Asciidoctor 0.1.1 release. You can track the release progress in the issue tracker:

https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/issues?milestone=1&page=1&state=open

Each open issues has a pull request pending, in addition to a few extra pull requests. As soon as those are all merged in, I'm recommending that we tag 0.1.1 (Monday or Tuesday).

I'll share a more detailed changelog when we announce the release. Off the top of my head, the big change that 0.1.1 introduces is that it processes all the markup in one pass, whereas previously it was evaluating the preprocessor directives (ifdef, include and attribute entries) on a first pass, then going back and parsing all the other markup (see issue #143 [1]). This split was causing processing directives to be evaluated differently than in AsciiDoc. That's now resolved.

We've also been working on a default stylesheet for Asciidoctor. That's planned for 0.1.2, which you can track here:

https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/issues?milestone=2&page=1&state=open

-Dan

[1] https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/issues/143

--

Dan Allen

Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction

--

Dan Allen

Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Re-Schedule-for-next-release-Asciidoctor-0-1-1-tp9.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML