Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 posts
|
There is a new version of the gitbucket-asciidoctor-plugin.
https://github.com/lefou/gitbucket-asciidoctor-plugin/releases/tag/0.1.1 GitBucket is a Open Source GitHub clone powered by Scala which has easy installation and high extensibility. Best regards, Tobias |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
2681 posts
|
Great news! If you are interested, you are welcome to have the repo join the asciidoctor organization for exposure. But certainly no obligation. Just an invitation. Cheers, -Dan On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Tobias Roeser [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote: There is a new version of the gitbucket-asciidoctor-plugin. Dan Allen | @mojavelinux | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 posts
|
Hi Dan,
thank you for the great offer. My heart says yes and I would be honoured to have the repository join the asciidoctor organization, which is absolutely a great community. From a technical perspective, the plugin is more tied to the GitBucket ecosystem and lifecycle. E.g. the GitBucket Plugin API is used to be not binary compatible between version upgrades, which forces me to produce new (binary) releases now and then. Version upgrades of Asciidoctor are less demanding in this regard. But there was no invitation from their side (and based on our history, I wouldn't assume one in the near future). Let me sleep about it. If forking is an option, this would also increase exposure without moving the maintenance responsibility. Best regards, Tobias |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
2681 posts
|
Please take your time to think about it. You should know hat the only difference is the git URL. Otherwise, you have all the same permissions. You are just managing the repository in a different location, one that will show up in the list when people visit the Asciidoctor organization on GitHub. And you can then assign issues to other people in the organization (or they can assign the issues to themselves). It kind of just makes everything work a bit better. But you still run it 100%. -Dan On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Tobias Roeser [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Dan, ... [show rest of quote] Dan Allen | @mojavelinux | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |