Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Hello,
I see in the inline icons chapter (http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#inline-icons) that for size: "First positional attribute; scales the icon; values: large, 2x, 4x" I guess that "large" ==how fa-lg (33% increase)... But it doesn't work... How can I get an intermediate size between 1x and 2x... Thanks Patrick |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Hi,
I fear the documentation is not updated. You can use "lg" to define the 33% increase*. Keep in mind that Asciidoctor does some magic but in the end it relies on FontAwesome styles, so pretty much every example here (http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/) works if you use the right word. In the end, asciidoctor takes the arguments of the macro and builds the style prepending "fa-", so you can use 2x,3x,4x,5x,lg. In fact, you can "hack" several other options liker border or spin, but that's not a good practice and I am not sure how we should deal with them. I opened and issue to discuss this: this https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/issues/1475. * Btw, I've seen that "lg" adds some extra CSS (line-height: .75em; vertical-align: -15%;), beware. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Hi,
Great, it works... ! I think I tried "1g" instead of "lg"... I already tried the spin but didn't notice the border and others.... cheers Patrick |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
I tried the border... It seem to work but only partially...
eg: This works: icon:heart[border] This doesn't (no border) icon:heart[2x,border] icon:heart[border,size=2x] Anyway, I can live without this :) |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Just a little disclaimer.
Keep in mind that only size, rotate and flip are officially supported. Other features like border or spin, even when they can be "achieved", it's done with a side effect of the implementation. That's why I filed the issue on GitHub, to discuss what should be the correct behauviour. Also, don't forget this applies to HTML conversion. According to documentation (http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#size-rotate-and-flip), the first attribute is by default the size. Again, due to how it is implemented, you can apply some styles, but this is not made on purpouse, or at least seeing the code it does not seem to me like that. Until Dan says something about this, I would try to avoid them and stick to the official supported features. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Administrator
|
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 2:57 PM, abelsromero [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:
I think the focus of that issue should be on allowing these features to be used. Many didn't exist at the time the macro was introduced, so we didn't properly account for them. But now we could make the necessary adjustments. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by patrickm
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 1:18 PM, patrickm [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote: icon:heart[border,size=2x] One way to trick it into working right now is doing: icon:heart["2x fa-border"] I think it would be better if the following was supported: icon:heart[2x,role=fa-border] However, the role ends up in the wrong place. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by abelsromero
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 10:40 AM, abelsromero [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote: I fear the documentation is not updated. I just updated it :) |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |