mojavelinux wrote
I agree 100%. I'm eager to see an implementation in Go. Look for the recent thread about the AsciiDoc grammar. We'll need to settle on that before (or in the process of) such an implementation or else we risk diverging on parsing behavior. In other words, once we have a more formal grammar definition, new implementations become much simpler.
I spent some time with Python-powered static-site-generator where reST markup was supported well, but now I'm definitely settling on Hugo and Golang in general, so wonder if something has changed in regard to AsciiDoc grammar?
From my perspective I'd say that Golang is really becoming more and more popular, while [Hugo](
https://github.com/spf13/hugo) is trending Golang application with >16K Github stars, 470 contributors...
I do hope that the Go implementation will be written to use a recursive
decent parser for inline syntax and not the regex approach that we are
currently trying to move away from :)
Hugo does track possible Golang [implementation](
https://github.com/VonC/asciidocgo) of AsciiDoc(tor), but it is, unfortunately, abandoned.
However, I still believe that Asciidoc(tor)+Golang would be match in heaven. :
I plan to jump into learning Golang, but native Asciidoc(tor) implementation would probably be still an overkill for my skills...still, I'm ready to help.