Add a new slim backend vs extension vs ... for empty checkbox

Hi,

I try to figure out what is the best strategy with Asciidoctor 0.1.4 to generate this HTML content from asciidoctor

    <input type="checkbox" id="showhideblock"/>
    <label id="showhide" for="showhideblock"></label>
    <div class="acontent">As mentioned earlier, the stdout and stderr are tracked for logging purposes.
        Users can access current and archived App logs created in each App environment.
    </div>

Remark : This HTML syntax is used with CSS to show/hide text - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19170781/show-hide-divs-on-click-in-html-and-css-without-jquery

Add a new slim backend to process input & label vs create an extension vs something else ?
I don't really see also how I could specify with asciidoctor syntax to declare an empty label & checkbox ...

Regards,

Charles

Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Technologist Evangelist / Blogger / MiddleWare Specialist
Twitter : @cmoulliard

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

Why are you trying to do this with Asciidoctor 0.1.4? If it's just HTML you're looking for you may need to use a passthru block.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:07 AM, ch007m [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I try to figure out what is the best strategy with Asciidoctor 0.1.4 to generate this HTML content from asciidoctor

    <input type="checkbox" id="showhideblock"/>
    <label id="showhide" for="showhideblock"></label>
    <div class="acontent">As mentioned earlier, the stdout and stderr are tracked for logging purposes.
        Users can access current and archived App logs created in each App environment.
    </div>

Remark : This HTML syntax is used with CSS to show/hide text - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19170781/show-hide-divs-on-click-in-html-and-css-without-jquery

Add a new slim backend to process input & label vs create an extension vs something else ?
I don't really see also how I could specify with asciidoctor syntax to declare an empty label & checkbox ...

Regards,

Charles

Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Technologist Evangelist / Blogger / MiddleWare Specialist
Twitter : @cmoulliard

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

--

Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477p3478.html

To unsubscribe from Add a new slim backend vs extension vs ... for empty checkbox, click here.
NAML

I can't use passthrough as the content is created by the user using plain asciidoctor syntax. I will perhaps create a new block type 

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:03 PM, LightGuardjp [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Why are you trying to do this with Asciidoctor 0.1.4? If it's just HTML you're looking for you may need to use a passthru block.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:07 AM, ch007m [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I try to figure out what is the best strategy with Asciidoctor 0.1.4 to generate this HTML content from asciidoctor

    <input type="checkbox" id="showhideblock"/>
    <label id="showhide" for="showhideblock"></label>
    <div class="acontent">As mentioned earlier, the stdout and stderr are tracked for logging purposes.
        Users can access current and archived App logs created in each App environment.
    </div>

Remark : This HTML syntax is used with CSS to show/hide text - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19170781/show-hide-divs-on-click-in-html-and-css-without-jquery

Add a new slim backend to process input & label vs create an extension vs something else ?
I don't really see also how I could specify with asciidoctor syntax to declare an empty label & checkbox ...

Regards,

Charles

Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Technologist Evangelist / Blogger / MiddleWare Specialist
Twitter : @cmoulliard

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

--

Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477p3478.html

To unsubscribe from Add a new slim backend vs extension vs ... for empty checkbox, click here.
NAML

--

Charles Moulliard

Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat

Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog :  http://cmoulliard.github.io

Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Technologist Evangelist / Blogger / MiddleWare Specialist
Twitter : @cmoulliard

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477p3479.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

Something similar to this already exists in Asciidoctor extensions. In fact, two places, both of which key off a role.

First, the view result postprocessor by Rob Winch:

https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-extensions-lab/blob/master/lib/view-result-postprocessor/extension.rb

The other is the click block that's in Asciidoctor LaTeX created by Jim Carlsson.

https://vschool.s3.amazonaws.com/manuscripts/389.html#_click_blocks

https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-latex/blob/master/lib/asciidoctor/latex/click_block.rb

Hopefully, that gives you a start. I strongly believe that you can accomplish this using a role.

Cheers,

-Dan

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:40 AM, ch007m [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

I can't use passthrough as the content is created by the user using plain asciidoctor syntax. I will perhaps create a new block type 

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:03 PM, LightGuardjp [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Why are you trying to do this with Asciidoctor 0.1.4? If it's just HTML you're looking for you may need to use a passthru block.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:07 AM, ch007m [via Asciidoctor :: Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I try to figure out what is the best strategy with Asciidoctor 0.1.4 to generate this HTML content from asciidoctor

    <input type="checkbox" id="showhideblock"/>
    <label id="showhide" for="showhideblock"></label>
    <div class="acontent">As mentioned earlier, the stdout and stderr are tracked for logging purposes.
        Users can access current and archived App logs created in each App environment.
    </div>

Remark : This HTML syntax is used with CSS to show/hide text - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19170781/show-hide-divs-on-click-in-html-and-css-without-jquery

Add a new slim backend to process input & label vs create an extension vs something else ?
I don't really see also how I could specify with asciidoctor syntax to declare an empty label & checkbox ...

Regards,

Charles

Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Technologist Evangelist / Blogger / MiddleWare Specialist
Twitter : @cmoulliard

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

--

Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477p3478.html

To unsubscribe from Add a new slim backend vs extension vs ... for empty checkbox, click here.
NAML

--

Charles Moulliard

Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat

Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog :  http://cmoulliard.github.io

Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Technologist Evangelist / Blogger / MiddleWare Specialist
Twitter : @cmoulliard

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477p3479.html

To start a new topic under Asciidoctor :: Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Asciidoctor :: Discussion, click here.
NAML

--

Dan Allen | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Add-a-new-slim-backend-vs-extension-vs-for-empty-checkbox-tp3477p3480.html

To unsubscribe from Add a new slim backend vs extension vs ... for empty checkbox, click here.
NAML